On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno <greno(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
>
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
>
> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
That is just untrue. SecureBoot can be used to make sure you only run
the software you intended to run, which is impossible without
SecureBoot (e.g. this cannot be done with a TPM). The idea is solid,
the technology is or can be made solid.
No. The user is not in control here.
Microsoft is in control.
Try user-modifying a previously approved installation and see if you, the user, can boot
it.