Mike Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:48:10 -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> You might want to look at darcs. This one looks the most promising, in
> it's
> design. Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.
Darcs also has scalability issues as admitted to by the author. So I guess
it would fail for the same reasons subversion and arch did.
thanks -mike
Yes, that's why I said the _design_ looks promising. The implementation
still is immature.