On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:37:06AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> I disagree. It is mad to have something monolithic when there are
> different upstreams.
Perhaps there could be a little less squabbling about which upstream is
theoretically better, and a little more focus on the problem that the
current combination of texlive with tetex-tex4ht produces unusable
garbage?
I am focused on this. The tex4ht version is more up to date that the one
that comes with texlive.
I get a big sweep of white space instead of a table of
contents. This doesn't happen on Fedora 7 or 6.
Bugzilla is a better place for these discussion, please file a bug, with
the document (if possible), the command-line and the output.
Also did you tried the tex4ht version bundled with texlive and produced
a correct document or is it a guess?
--
Pat