Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 18.12.07 09:24, Patrice Dumas (pertusus(a)free.fr) wrote:
>
>>> It's not that PA doesn't work at all on those special no-X-involved
>>> setups. The only limitation is that you need to run PA manually in
>>> such setups. -- No big deal!
>> Is there something like a session pam module planned to start PA to
>> achieve independence from the the login entry point?
> I am not convinced that PAM is the right place to start any daemons.
But gdm is?
why not start PA from an init script ?