> The Glibc package maintainer. I'm pretty sure he understands
> upstream, and FESCo should probably start the discussion with him
> first anyway.
I'm not exactly sure what glibc "upstream" (defined as people without
commit rights to Fedora git) have to do with this at all. The issue
AIUI is that unproven glibc changes are getting committed to stable
Fedora branches rather than rawhide where they belong. Surely, this
is a matter to discuss with the Fedora maintainer(s) of glibc and
nobody
else.
They are mostly the same people.
Its not like glibc is that inviting for a development community to gather around.
Dave.