On Jul 19, 2013 2:16 PM, "Bill Nottingham" <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Miloslav Trmač (mitr(a)volny.cz) said:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Billy Crook <billycrook(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Please voice yourself at meetings in #fedora-devel if this
is
important to
> > you.
>
> (Speaking purely for myself and not for other FESCo members,) I do
> want to hear from Fedora contributors - but I'd much rather hear on
> the mailing list (where messages arrive over the course of a week or
> more) rather than during the FESCo meeting (when we have only a few
> minutes to agree on a decision, and already frequently have two or
> three parallel subconversations).
I agree with this statement.
In terms of this feature as presented, I'm not seeing why having $MTA in
the
minimal install where you need the installer to have a required
configury
step for it is a proper use of everyone's time that's installing it.
Enterprise administrators are almost certainly pushing out their own
configurations directly via puppet/chef/ansible/etc. Desktop users are
primarily doing it as part of their MUA setup, or just using webmail.
It's not as if the default MTA configuration, as I understand it (no smart
host, attempt to send all mail directly with the FQDN) is generally useful
OOTB.
It is to me, and I suspect I am not alone.