At some point Steven Pritchard wrote:
> Therefore, one clamd server per service (mailscanner, squid, ...)
is
> the only installation which makes sense; a system-wide clamd is not
> possible.
I totally disagree. This is no different than random users wanting to
allow access to something from apache but nothing else... It doesn't
require an infinite number of apache processes running under different
UIDs.
I have to agree with this completely!!!
There's no need to make things harder or more tangled than they have to
be.
Thomas