On Tue, 21.06.11 00:52, Reindl Harald (h.reindl(a)thelounge.net) wrote:
> If there are dependencies missing, then they should be added to
the
> respective init script headers, please file bugs against the respective
> packages.
it has to respect "# chkconfig: - 79 31" since this worked for years
and F15 should provide native services, and there are not native
services for F15 while F15 replaces upstart with systemd QA had
to suspend F15 becasue it was not ready as it was released
It respects that, but it LSB header information if available takes
precedence.
sorry, but i have to tell you that the real world and yours are not
everytime the same - it is idiotic to file bugs against sysv-scripts
and try to fix some legacy stuff because QA forbid to make it right
and provide a natuve systemd service
It is usually very simple to fix LSB headers that already exist. It's
mostly about adding a single word to them.
ANYWAYS: What you will not understand is that the order allone
is not enough since you try fire up services as fast as possible
and at the same time, so we come to the problem below
We start them as fast as possible, adhering to the ordering constraints
expressed in the LSB headers (or chkconfig prio if no LSB headers are
available.)
>> so we come to the next major problem:
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714525
>> it does not really matter for the admin who and why fires up mysqld in
>> this case - if i say "systemctl stop mysqld" i mean this exactly so,
>> everytime in everycase and systemd has to respect this!
>
> As Michal and I independently verified systemd is actually behaving
> correctly here, and you are running into a different problem, most
> likely because mysql is autospawned on your activated socket
this socket is needed because many things are broken if they start
before mysqld is ready for connections, so it is highly recommended
that systemd NEVER starts a service which was stopped by "systemctl
stop service" - if systemd starts in this case myqld because some
process try to write in the socket this is a bug or if you say
this is not a bug and expected this way it is broken by design
Well, if you use .socket units, then you need to shut them down too, if
you want to be sure a service is never triggered due to socket
activation.
Note that to my knowledge mysql is not patched for socket activation,
and hence cannot be used with .socket units.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.