Friday, March 12, 2010, 7:02:54 PM, Kevin wrote:
Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Maybe part of the answer is that some resources (especially
> automation) need to be dedicated to keep the core critical components
> of rawhide from being gratuitously broken and staying that way?
An answer to what question? Certainly not to the points I made!
The problem is not with gratuitous breakage, but with breakage
inherent to a
rolling branch such as Rawhide.
Kevin Kofler
And turning all releases into rolling branches helps keep things
sane?
Please call a spade a spade. Without a reduction in churn in the stable
releases that is what they become and remain until EOL - a rolling branch.