On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:49 -0600, Michael Favia wrote:
>Mostly to keep the signal/noise ratio down.
>
>
Sounds awful elitist and Machiavellian for a community driven project.
All major open source projects have closed lists to keep the s/n ratio
down for other development discussions. We're following the model GNOME
used for gnome-hackers and gnome-hackers-readonly
(though they then made the mistake of desktop-devel-list which became
rather noisy, again)
I agree, but then you are just granting the illusion of a community
controlled project arent you? Essentially the real discussion concerning
dev will have been moved to f-m right? I understand that trying to keep
No. If a community member not on fedora-maintainers reads something in
fedora-maintainers-readonly, I'm sure the thread can be continued on in
fedora-devel-list
the project moving without all of this "change is bad" and
"me too" crap
is important but i think that this "fix" fails to live up to the
community aspect of the project doesnt it? Essentially your voice doesnt
matter if you arent a maintainer anymore because the other lists will be
read less and less by RH and maintainers over time. As a result you will
lose the community driven nature i think because all of the opinions
batted about will be those of maintainers alone. A moderated white list
of users that conduct themselves in a prescribed manner makes most sense
to me.
No. Folk will still read fedora-devel, and don't feel left out by it
Also, the other thing to keep in mind is that getting a package
maintained isn't too hard, and the Extras process is now, open. My last
cvs sync gave me about 572 packages in Extras; last time I checked with
the "universe" of packages that another major distribution had, they fit
an entire 2 DVDs iirc. So contribute more packages, I guess, and lets
make Fedora rock (harder)!
--
Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
http://www.bytebot.net/
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi