>> This proposal was soundly rejected, so don't worry about
it.
>
> That's great news. Thank you!
I am not thrilled that this has been rejected since efi support is not
so good on Fedora.
How do you mean, it's supported quite well IMO with support for things
like secure boot and UEFI capsule updates for updating system firmware
I feel it's in quite good state with people improving on things
constantly.
Devices that are BIOS can IIRC still use efi using a boot tool
installed to the MBR which emulates EFI
and than loads the EFI loader. This would be a one time step.
Why bother, just adds an extra layer of complexity with no added
benefits that UEFI provides.
Hopefully Fedora will have enough resources to support systemd-boot
on
Fedora Silverblue,
which has never worked so far due to ostree naming conventions
I see that less likely because of the need to have a already stretched
team supporting yet another boot path.
>
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1951
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org