On Sex, 2013-01-25 at 12:56 -0800, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
> > [...]
> > With the more fine grained texlive packaging in F>18 where
> > tex(latex) is provided by texlive-collection-latex I am finding
> > that this is insufficient to build most documents. I see two
> > options in these cases:
> >
> > 1) Add BuildRequires; texlive-collection-latexextra (nb.
> > texlive-collection-latexrecommended isn't usually sufficient)
Yes. Do this.
I think, especially now as this dep tuning is going on, that the first
step should be to bring out these "big gun" dependencies like:
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexextra
And get stuff working quickly.
After the dust has settled with the transition and deps are even
slightly modularized (from the old "latex"), then maybe at a future
date the Deps can be investigated with more granularity, and
the texlive-collections can be optimized.
For
/usr/share/doc/VirtualBox-4.2.6/UserManual.pdf
/usr/share/doc/VirtualBox-4.2.6/UserManual_fr_FR.pdf
I need add
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 18
BuildRequires: doxygen-latex
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-fontsrecommended
BuildRequires: texlive-ec
BuildRequires: texlive-ucs
BuildRequires: texlive-tabulary
BuildRequires: texlive-fancybox
%endif
texlive-collection-latexextra seems is not required
Regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.