Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> What do you suggest to fix that? What do you feel is wasting
> resources?
>> This causes "current fedora" to be of
"suboptimal quality"
> Without concrete examples and measurements, it is very hard to
fix
> this.
So, how would you obtain the measurements, which are the obvious
first
step? Some sort of interactive poll, either on a web site or a
program that posts the results.
Fedora can look at Bugzilla logs, download logs (specially about updates),
access to their webpages, monitor what "the press" says, ... No need for a
(very unreliable!) "please answer this webpage's poll, if you happen to
wander this way and feel like it".
>> and causes people to ask for "Fedora LTS".
> Non sequitur.
On the contrary, it follows perfectly from developers that don't
know/care about the end user perception/experience.
Even worse. If the perception is that "developers don't care", why would
the perception about some LTS /handled by the same volunteers as a
sideline/ be any better?
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616
counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513