On 31/03/2024 20.52, Christopher Klooz wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2024 20.21, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 31 2024 at 09:56:04 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
>> <mcatanzaro(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I'm really frustrated with our communication regarding this issue.
>>> Does anybody know who can fix this?
>>
>> The Fedora Magazine article has been fixed (thanks!).
>>
> "*Fedora Linux 40 branched users (i.e. pre-Beta) likely received the
> potentially vulnerable /5.6.0-2.fc40/ build
> <
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4417db3376> if
> the system updated between March 2nd and March 6th*. Fedora Linux 40
> Beta users only using stable repositories are NOT impacted. Fedora
> Linux 39 and 38 users are also NOT impacted."
>
> -> only pre-beta, not beta, affected
> -> F40 beta using stable NOT impacted (without challenging the
> previously distributed assumption that testing is disabled by default)
>
> That's still the same false information, isn't it?
Justin just has shown up in discourse. I suggested to get in touch with
you, Adam or Kevin since he seemed to be convinced the article is fine
as it is. When I refresh the article, it still seems to be unchanged. Is
the update you mean already online Michael?
I clarified what's wrong with Justin in a DM on Matrix. He was on the
same garden path as I was regarding "Beta release" vs. "Final
release".
There will be another update to the article.
-- Sandro