Michel Salim wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Kofler
<kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
> Bryan O'Sullivan <bos <at> serpentine.com> writes:
>> There are periodic threads about how pushing the new hotness to a
>> stable release is a bad idea. This seems like a clear-cut case of why.
>> I can understand the fellow's desire to package his window manager,
>> but why can't it wait until F10?
> We'll also need cmake 2.6 to push KDE 4.2 ~6 months from now. And there's
more
> and more stuff requiring 2.6 already (which is why the upgrade was requested in
> the first place). So IMHO the sooner it gets into F9, the better.
>
Will KDE 4.2 be pushed into F-9, though? I understand the rationale
for upgrading F-9's KDE to 4.1, but 4.2?
Speaking of... where *is* KDE 4.1 for F9? Is it not in the system yet?
All I see seems to be 4.0.5.
--
Matthew
Person A: It's an ISO standard.
Person B: ...And that means what?
--mal (
http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html)