On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:20 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > No, I think he may have been suggesting that the old "line in the
sand"
> > might be a good starting point for such differentiation.
>
> Right on the "spot" :-)
Unfortunately that line was pretty darn arbitrary, and nobody has put
forth a serious effort to draw a real logical line.
We were kicking around, in QA, using the same definition currently used
for release-critical bugs: anything that can feasibly stop the system
booting, stop X working, stop networking working, or stop you being able
to update the system (i.e. yum+dependencies) would be 'core'.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net