On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22:12PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:31:17PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat
> decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in
> making that a primary arch?
RHEL supports Itanic, and that isn't even _built_ for Fedora, never
mind as a secondary arch.
IIUC, it isn't setup us a proper secondary arch, but there are people who
are rebuilding Fedora for ia64
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ia64-list/
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|