Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable?
>>>>
>>> Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL
>>> customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386
>>> would still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a
>>> secondary arch in Fedora. . .
>>
>> This is not relevant for fedora's decisions.
>>
>> -sv
>>
> I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat
> decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in
> making that a primary arch?
>
I'm saying since rhel goals and guidelines are not public knowledge we
cannot go guessing at them and it is not relevant for what fedora
needs to do.
-sv
Fair enough.
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie