On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 09:32 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I've had a few off-list conversations with various community
members
about this. One thing that came up was that the alternative namespace is
necessary, but also that "lom" is a sub-optimal choice. One idea that
did come up was simply to call them "net" (net0, etc.) or perhaps
"net"
followed by another letter like "netm" or something. To avoid
bikeshedding this to death though, I think Matt's "lom" naming is fine
for the moment unless we happen to all agree on something else.
Just to add, if something like "net" were used, you'd still need an
extra letter to distinguish between "LOM" and others since the initial
focus is only on LOM and you don't want to create a new namespace only
to have to do so again later on.
Jon.