On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:45:39 -0500
Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us> wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2008, Warren Togami wrote:
> sinjdoc
With the removal of sinjdoc gcj now requires openjdk for javadoc. due to a
bug its been that way at buildtime for awhile now. but sinjdoc was a Requires
and worked for runtime javadoc needs. but now the only javadoc parser is in
openjdk. IMO this is bad.
Why is that bad?
josh