On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our “First”
foundation.
>
> Simple reason - while Oracle decided to move Java to a faster, time
> based release cycle the Java community essentially shrugged the
> proverbial shoulders and ignored Oracle.
>
> Much of the Java ecosystem is still only supported on Java 8, and if
> you go to
adoptopenjdk.net the default choice remains Java 8.
I'm afraid that Oracle inherited a lot of Sun's practices on
software
versioning when they bought Java. The version naming scheme, numbering
scheme, and the release schedule, are inconsistent, unpredictable, and
cannot be relied on from Oracle's announcements, Ergo, right now,
Oracle is deprecating Java 8, and encouraging the current LTS, Java
11. Make no prodictions for the schedule or the next LTS release, this
is *right now*.
According to the table at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_version_history
Java 11 is LTS, and the next LTS will be Java 17 in 2021. There are also
planned releases in between, with dates given.
By the way, isn't Redhat main driving force behind Java 11 at the moment? What to
make from
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/leadership-openjdk-8-and-o...
?
--
Tomasz Torcz "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
xmpp: zdzichubg(a)chrome.pl wagon filled with backup tapes." -- Jim Gray