Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 22:16 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Similarly, but more subtly, comparing dist-f8-updates-testing with
> dist-f9-updates as the script now does also makes no sense.
Actually yes it does. There are often times when an update is only
issued on an older branch and not issued on a newer branch, therefor it
is necessary to compare all of the older branch against the newer
branch. This will lead to some false positives and can be ignored, but
it can also detect real situations that require fixing.
But won't comparing dist-f8-updates-testing with dist-f9-updates-testing and
dist-f8-updates with dist-f9-updates already catch those cases, without causing
false positives?
Kevin Kofler