seth vidal <skvidal(a)phy.duke.edu>:
> > ugh - a lot of data in rpms is not utf-8 happy. Often in
latin-1 or
> > beyond that in the encoding.
>
> Again, that's OK. The stuff in the message doesn't include the
> RPM itself, One of the fields is optionally an
> associated-file-resource URL that could *point* at an RPM, but
> that's a different matter.
no I mean things like:
descriptions
vendor names
packager names
summaries
filenames
shall I continue? :)
Maybe you'd better. You're not making any sense to me, which could mean
either that you are being stupid, or that I am being stupid, or that we
are talking right past one another. We'd better figure out which :-).
All bug-bugzilla does is mine some strings out of an RFC822-conformant
message and use them to script the bug-submission CGI on a Bugzilla instance.
You can think of the message as a job card. (The fields in the job card
can be supplied, or overridden, by command-line options.)
One of the fields handed to the CGI may be a URL pointing to an RPM.
It seems to me that the encoding of strings *in the RPM* is not an issue at
all for bug-bugzilla. Only the contents of the fields in the job card
is an issue. I don't understand why the requirement that those be UTF-8
should ever be onerous.
--
<a
href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>