Quoting Vít Ondruch (2012-05-22 10:01:06)
Dne 21.5.2012 18:47, Stanislav Ochotnicky napsal(a):
> Quoting Ralf Corsepius (2012-05-21 17:13:56)
>> On 05/21/2012 12:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>>> On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> -1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
>>> And your commit messages are written by aliens?
>> My change logs are inside of the rpm.spec.
>>
>>> You are lucky! I have to
>>> write them myself (and I really hate that I have to write the same
>>> information thrice
>> I usually write them once:
>> <editor> *.spec
>> fedpkg clog
>> fedpkg commit -F clog -p
>>
>> [Due to "fedpkg clog" weaknesses, the commits being generated look
awful.]
> Yes, I didn't like them either. That's why instead of whining I sent
> Jesse a patch and it's been fixed for a few months. I suggest you retry.
Ah, that was you who is proposing patches against guidelines [1] and
expectations, so now fedpkg is providing broken clog?
You are mixing up spec %changelog with SCM log. Only thing I've changed
was removing "-" in first item and adding 1 empty line after it. I never
use clog for creating changelog in spec so I don't know how it's
supposed to work. I assume it stopped working right after cvs->fedpkg
transition. Guidelines say nothing about SCM log, just about spec
%changelog format
I just do C-c C-r to raise release number, C-c C-e to
write my message, then "fedpkg commit -c" to create commit out of it.
Works like a charm
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com