On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We
could also
require signed commits I guess.
I think it would slow things down quite a lot to require peer review of
every commit.
I'd personally like to avoid anything where we need to support gpg.
It's a mess and I think it would waste a lot of cycles explaining how to
use it or help people get setup. ;( If there's some easier/more clear
way to sign things that could be a option tho.
kevin