On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> wrote:
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>> No, because xulrunner needs it to rebuild. Why is libvpx breaking
>> package builds? Almost nothing should depend on it. The plan is for the
>> libvpx update to go out at the same time as the xulrunner update.
>
> Sorry, got busy with Real Life and couldn't get back to this thread
> yesterday. In my case, it is because of this chain of dependencies:
>
> PyQt4-devel =>
> PyQt4 (via libQtWebKit) =>
> qtwebkit (via libQtLocation & libQtSensors) =>
> qt-mobility (via libgstphotography) =>
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free =>
> libvpx
Which buildroot? rawhide? f16? (As far as I recall, rawhide, f16 should
have the new libvpx, gstreamer-plugins-bad-free tagged properly)
Yes, the buildroots are both fine now. Thanks for fixing them. I was
just responding to spot's apparent surprise that an updated libvpx in
the buildroot should have broken package building for other people.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/