On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:46:27PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> >> <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +0000, Zbigniew
Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> >> > 3. The default landing page for a package shows a message
about
> >> >> > the missing readme. Maybe we could show the %description
there in
> >> >> > such cases?
> >> >>
> >> >> Or as an interim, show the spec file?
> >> >
> >> > What would you think of:
http://ambre.pingoured.fr/public/Pagure-DistGit.png ?
> >> >
> >> > The description comes from the rawhide repo via mdapi. So to update
the
> >> > description, simply update the package in rawhide.
> >> >
> >> > You can then simply complement these information with a README file.
> >>
> >> +1 that looks much better IMO
> >
> > +1 too, that looks much better.
> >
> > The icons/links at the bottom look useful, but "Packages" is cryptic
> > though — everything is about "packages" in this context.
>
> They map to the same as the ones say here
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/neard/
Right. My point is that the icon description shouldn't just be "packages"
— it should be something which is legible to outside casual contributors.
Maybe "Fedora package administration".
and is meant to be a place for anyone (contributor and non-contributor) to find
information about the packages in Fedora.
It is not an admin interface, you cannot login in there.
I am most definitively open to rename that link, but I lack a better word.
Pierre