On 01/20/2015 01:08 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 20/01/15 11:53, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> * Other developers:
> ** Add /tmp-inst and /var/tmp/tmp-inst to filesystem. (packagename: filesystem)
> ** Enable namespaces in /etc/security/namespace.conf (packagename: PAM)
> ** Enable proper selinux context and polyinstantiation_enabled boolean to be
> set (packagename: selinux-policy-targeted or selinux-policy)
So this effectively reverses tmp-on-tmpfs for users other than root and adm
right? Because /tmp will actually be a subdirectory of /tmp-inst which will be a
real directory?
Why do you think this? I don't see any reason why the new tmp-inst directories
can
not be on tmpfs...
Incidentally, why /tmp-inst but /var/tmp/tmp-inst? Why not
/tmp/tmp-inst for
/tmp or /var/tmp-inst for /var/tmp? Shouldn't the naming be consistent?
Tom
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com