On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:22 -0700, Tom London wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Adam Williamson
<awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 10:31 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 06:26 -0700, Tom London wrote:
>>
>> > My @home monitor does not support KMS; I'll retest with my "KMS
>> > approved" monitor @work.
>>
>> Can you clarify this statement? The monitor really shouldn't factor
>> into whether KMS works or not. Admittedly there's been some bugs with
>> the I2C code in the kernel (turns out KMS is the first serious user of
>> it, who knew), but X's mode selection logic is independent of who does
>> I2C.
>
> Also, what's the bug #?
> --
BZ'ed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489987 (filed
on "Intel Test Day")....
Ah, that one. OK. I don't remember all bug reports, I track a lot. :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net