Am 10.03.2014 20:18, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Reindl Harald
<h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2....
>
> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during
basic
> document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due
> dependencie problems?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-10.0.3-1.20140206.fc20
... again broken dep and someone gave it +1 regardless. You should
know that "someone" very well ;)
Now seriously auto qa detected the broken dep. Maybe it should give
negative karma even if there are false positives a wrong negative
karma is not the end of the world ...
yes i know that one well, that's why that one notified
here that rebuilds are needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066718
the difference is:
* that packages install and are running here the whole day
* now downloads from other builds required
* the openoffice one did *not* install from the build alone
in no case at all