Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Sorry, if I misunderstood. When someone describes an alternative to
> promote their argument, I assume they are promoting the alternative as
> well. But what did that mean if it's not what he wants?
It just means exactly what it says. If you don't agree with a license
terms, you don't get permission to distribute the software even if the
licensing terms seem odd to you as noted by a judge in the recent Skype
case for violating GPL.
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2008/05/08/
This simple fact requires no assumption on your part.
There are a near-infinite number of simple facts that someone could post
here. But why, unless they mean to promote or advocate them?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com