On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 13:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:44:47AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Hello all,
> I think this kind of bug should not be filled against the single
> package, but something like against infrastructure. Also it should
> block all bugs assigned to that user.
>
> This can be useful if a user maintains several packages. This way
> all bugs receive a notification that the "unresponsive package
> maintainer" policy was started for that maintainer.
>
> For an example, I've just opened such a bug [2] for boinc-client
> maintainer that owns several other packages with open bugs and no
> activity since May.
What should happens, if the reporter of the nune-responsive maintainer bug only
want to takeover a single package, but the unresponsive maintainer owns
several packages?
They should be orphaned; it's not good from any angle for packages to be
'maintained' by someone who has been established to be non-responsive.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net