Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> While this should probably be considered a bug that needs to
be fixed,
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451463
And Frank Ch. Eigler closed it, explaining that:
> It turns out that this is a deliberate decision. As
> outlined within the .spec file, the -devel subrpm is for building
> systemtap modules (running pass 1..4); the -client subrpm is for being
> able to build
> systemtap modules -remotely-. Both those tasks happen to be performed by
> the same binary.
One could create a sub-subpackage that both subpackages depend on, but
it's getting to be silly. Is there no other option to handle this in RPM?
other option is the status quo, where a common file is shared among > 1
subpkg (which is acceptable, not particularly a bug per-se).
-- Rex