Sorry for the top posting.
Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora.
But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is
the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every
distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its
buildsystem, its bugtracker, its deepsolver, its rpm macro, its
standard and so on. Difficult that this will change in the near
future, if ever. My very long experience tell me this.
Best regards
(aside)
why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ?
Really ? But no.
2012/7/28, Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm(a)gmail.com>:
Hello all,
Any chance Fedora moves from Koji to OBS?
Why should they?
OBS has a web interface so one can easily fix packages even from an
internet cafe/work/windows pc.
Projects can be developed separately and packages can be easily
branched and submitted.
openSUSE is entirely build by OBS.
Third party are unstable packages maintainers, can develop them at one
place for different distributions.
e.g as we do with unity for Fedora
-PACKAGE_dir
*source.tar.gz
*dummy.patch
*%name-%distro.spec
*%name-%distro2.spec
*%name-.dsc
What would stop Fedora from doing this switch?
Regards,
Damian
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile