On 3/1/2010 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I will note again that 0 karma doesn't mean that it's not
been tested.
I run here with updates-testing enabled, but often only report -karma
when things break. There are just so many things in updates-testing,
that I usually don't have time or energy to +1 all of them that work.
I do the same. One big issue with giving positive karma is that you
probably aren't testing all use-cases for the software, so I'm hesitant
to +1 just because it didn't explode. It's important to know though
that is *didn't* explode (which certainly would result in negative karma
from any testers out there. I still think there aren't enough testers,
but neither should every tester give +1 to every package.
- Orion