I second this.
Can't we have only one stable repository which is for "Fedora",
instead of one each FC10, FC11, ...?
"development", "testing" and "stable" three repositories for
"Fedora"
as a whole and snapshots of stable as releases?
That would make definitely user's life simple and I believe would make
so even for the developers.
Regards,
Prasad
2009/6/21 Bharath <ajeetbharath(a)gmail.com>:
Hi all,
Why is necessary to have a particular package tagged as fc10 or fc11?? What
is the significance.? As it is, versions of the packages keep changing
independent of the Fedora versions.
For example :
kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc10.i386 is available for fc10
and the same version
kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc11.i386 is available for fc11
It wastes space,time(while upgrading from fc10 to fc11).... (I invite ppl to
add to the list)
Regards
Bharath
--
All roads lead to some other roads
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Prasad H. L.
PhD Student (with Dr. Shalabh Bhatnagar)
Department of Computer Science and Automation,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore - 560012