Hi
>>
> Wouldnt it be better to continue booting by automatically setting
> SELinux into permissive or disabled state while throwing out warnings
> at bootup and in the logs?.
>
> regards
> Rahul
>
No because this would break your security. It might be arguable if it
should bring it to single user mode though.
In the sense that a non bootable machine is more secure, yes but
providing a path to recovery would be good. If I remember right, the
error message didnt indicate the word SELinux and was pretty obscure. It
didnt provide any suggestions for recovery either.
regards
Rahul