On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
Václav Pavlín <vpavlin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
...snip...
Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file
to
the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and
contains Fedora specific configuration files (i.e. Fedora repo
files). The question of moving the file somewhere else than systemd
might be really interesting for working groups either. It defines
which services should be enabled by default after installation, which
might differ for different products. (Or not, has anybody thought
about this yet?) An example off top of my head - we would like to
have sshd enabled after installation by default on server, but
disabled on workstation.
I would like to ask release engineering for any feedback and
representatives of working groups to discuss this on their meetings.
Well, if the products want to diverge on what to start/enable, we could
do this I suppose. It's been suggested that we look at having a
fedora-release for each product (with deps on those things the product
advertises as part of their deliverable). If we go that route, this
file could live in each of those products fedora-release. (ie,
fedora-release-workstation, fedora-release-server, fedora-release-cloud
or whatever).
kevin