Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
That is your interpretation. I see nothing on this page to support
this
claim. And actually it is contrary to format #3 logic, since its main
difference with other changelog formats is that the version is not part of
the entry header, so there's no reason to limit one entry to one version
It's blatantly obvious that all these formats have one thing in common:
there's one entry per new EVR. Our automated tools (e.g. make clog as
already pointed out by Michael Schwendt) also expect that. But I guess I'll
need to get the FPC to officially clarify this.
Kevin Kofler