On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:27 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Frank Schmitt wrote:
> Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
> >> > Updated Packages:
> >>
> >> Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
> >
> > rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably
> > change very soon
>
> <rant>So an update to an Evoltion bugfix release is ok, an update to a
> KDE bugfix release two(?) weeks earlier is not. Great.</rant>
The updated evolution package isn't an update to a new version. It's an
updated build with a specific, small, targeted fix for a specific bug
that had been filed and was on the blocker list for the release.
If evolution were updated to version 2.0.3, then you could rant :)
I think he complains (and complained earlier) about evo being updated to
2.0.2 in the first place.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp(a)redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011