Matthew Garrett wrote:
Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
level.
Didn't YOU vote for ARM as a primary architecture, and even actively lobby
for it? Now you get to pick the (poisoned) fruit…
This nonsense is exactly what "primary architecture" means.
Kevin Kofler