On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:25:44PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Ugh, this seems like it would just create a lot of make-work for the
>> common case where packages *are* maintained. Perhaps only do this
>> for packages that appear via some criteria (have not been built, have
>> not been committed to, have lots of bugs with no response, etc.), but
>> doing it for *every* package seems like overkill.
>>
>
> Right - so maybe last check into devel branch since the last release of
> the distro.
>
> If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track down
> awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think.
The majority of my packages does not get updated that often (15 from 21)
and there are also no bug reports unhandled for them.
I am not sure how the ratio is for others, but it does not seem to be
such a got criterion.
so 15/21 your packages don't get rebuilt, atall, from release to release?
Really?
-sv