On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:22 +1100, Roy Rankin wrote:
My understanding is that the main reasons for the new requirement
that
fonts be in a separate package were better license visibility, better
sharing of fonts, and to save the user from downloading stable fonts
just because the code changes. And in my case, as the font is in the
source tar ball a sub-package is indicated.
I gave the font sub-package its own version so code changes would not
require installing a new font package, and this "protects" the version
number from rpmdev-bumpspec. However, It looks like doing this is not
consistent with the Fedora build system.
Is there a way to achieve what I want that will work?
It looks like there is already another package that is providing
'denemo-music-fonts','4.10','1.fc11'. There can be only one.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating