Il 21/mar/2014 12:59 "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> ha
scritto:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I agree with Jaroslav. I was looking forward to have a fourth
> product to those three. KDE can help define what is needed for new
> product, what must be done by all teams, how much work it will be
> ... I guess we should speak more about addition of new product and
> don't kill the idea at the start.
Like I said, I'm skeptical, but listening. :)
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
I think the same, if all spins become products we can also keep the actual
way. Fedora.next is a very good idea and I'm sure it will have success, but
it needs to follow his strategy with three different products, not having 2
different ones and *n* workstation-similar-products, IMHO.
I don't think spins are not useful, but they could be under the wing of
Workstation as a sub-product perhaps.
This is how I understand and think about fedora.next, so proliferation of
products is not really what it should be in my eyes.
Greetings
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)