On 5/25/21 5:04 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
> So the same model works totally fine for both desktop and
server.
I myself lack the exact technical knowledge, but (all?) server and file system experts I
hear consider just that a gross misconception.
I think you and Neal talk about two different things. The BTRFS
proponents claim that the subvolume technology allows you to have
flexible partitioning, so that you can dynamically create whatever
partition layout is appropriate for your situation. Nobody is claiming
that desktop partition scheme ('model') should be forced onto servers.