On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:14:59AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:12 AM Fabio Valentini
<decathorpe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 5:01 PM Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:37:28 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > > As a side note, the update now has arch specific BuildRequires, so
the SRPM
> > > > cannot be rebuilt on anything but <one random architecture>.
> > > >
> > > >
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/libreport?collection=f33
> > >
> > > Aaaw ... stuff like this makes me sad :(
> >
> > What makes me sad is the poorly maintained package %changelog. Instead of
> > summing up changes to the RPM package, it sums up changes internal to
> > libreport. It does not list any of the spec file changes.
> >
> > A massive commit to the package without any %changelog entry:
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libreport/c/246d3174118e03cbb345f1d434...
>
> True. This is bad :( This is also the commit that added %{?_isa} to
> BuildRequires. WHYYY
>
> > And later the addition of a %changelog entry that doesn't cover any of the
> > package changes.
>
> It's also for the wrong version (2.13-2 instead of 2.14-2) ... which
> was fixed in the next commit, with another Release bump. :(
As far as I know, libreport is directly synced from the
libreport.spec.in in the libreport git repo on GitHub:
https://github.com/abrt/libreport/blob/master/libreport.spec.in
So %{_isa} changes would be from this:
https://github.com/abrt/libreport/commit/729214f13b1c036e4f9299ddcd12e921...
I am unsure if ABRT folks are even reviewing stuff going on in
Dist-Git...
What do you mean by that?
--
Tomasz Torcz To co nierealne – tutaj jest normalne.
tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl Ziomale na życie mają tu patenty specjalne.