On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Also, there was dissent already in the
"auto-approving" of leaf-features
>> during the meeting discussion so I am not sure that auto-accepting of
>> Features in general given a lack of response is ever going to actually
>> happen. I personally wouldn't vote for it.
This proposal entirely avoids discussion of "leaf-features", "self
contained
features" or "complex features with system-wide impact" since there will
never by any reasonable metrics you can apply to decide. If you can't decide
what feature you are dealing with, how you want to judge if FESCo should be
approving it or not.
If some FESCo member thinks that is should be approved by FESCo, s/he still
has the power to open ticket for FESCo meeting. The same power as other
Fedora community members.
Actually I would be very interested to hear why there should not be
"auto-approving". Please enlighten me.
I explained my reasoning in the part of the email you cut off in your
reply.
josh