On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:41:24 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 20 April 2007 11:02:28 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>> On 4/20/07, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam(a)arcor.de> wrote:
>>>> --- uqm.spec 27 Jan 2007 02:33:09 -0000 1.12
>>>> +++ uqm.spec 20 Apr 2007 01:32:41 -0000 1.13
>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>> Name: uqm
>>>> Version: 0.6.2
>>>> -Release: 1%{?dist}
>>>> +Release: 1.1%{?dist}
>>> Should have been
>>>
>>> Release: 1.%{?dist}.1
>> Oh? News to me. Is that a new guideline?
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-378ec5e6a73...
That section is titled "Minor release bumps for old branches" -- but
this was devel afaics.
BTW, I curios, too, why it should have been "1.%{?dist}.1" (and yes, I
fully understand that 1.%{?dist}.1 makes sense in old branches).
OMG, I made typo. Should have read: 1%{?dist}.1
And yes, 2%{?dist} would have been fine, too.