On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:29:38PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking
that spec
> files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I
> think we'd be better having a post-build test warning that this package
> has files missing from the previous build. That could be advisory, or
> it could even gate, with the packager clearing the gate by updating the
> file list in the test, rather than in the spec file.
If you still have to keep a list, why is it better to keep it in tests
Separation of concerns. But also, you shouldn't have to keep a list per
se, just annotations of when it's okay that the list has changed.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader