On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 02:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
> > maintained) than to not have it at all!
>
> I think that's where some of us disagree with you.
>
> Having lots of parts of poor quality doesn't raise the global quality of
> Fedora. Having only a few parts, each of excellent quality, does.
Yeah, it's great until users start leaving for distros which actually have
packages of stuff they use.
The alternative being that users leave for distros which actually
properly maintain packages of stuff they use. :)
--
Mathieu